Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

Turbo rotor housings Vs Non Turbo Rotor housings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2008 | 11:33 AM
  #1  
Bastard's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 24
Default

So I keep hearing people say that the chrome thickness on a turbo housing is thicker then that of a non turbo housing... but I have compared them to the best of my ability and can't see any differences... is this something that only an electron microscope will see



where does this information come from. Is it myth or fact?... and if it is fact, can someone please provide me with the facts



thanks
Old 05-23-2008 | 12:42 PM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

nope that part, the expensive hard part, is the same.
Old 05-25-2008 | 01:08 AM
  #3  
thebluerx7's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
From: australia
Default

not sure what ur sayin there j9fd3s,but does that mean they are the same?(except maybe porting style from n/a to turbo)
Old 05-25-2008 | 07:29 AM
  #4  
Lynn E. Hanover's Avatar
Fabricator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,322
From: Central Ohio (Hebron) Zephyrhills Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by Bastard' post='900887' date='May 23 2008, 08:33 AM
So I keep hearing people say that the chrome thickness on a turbo housing is thicker then that of a non turbo housing... but I have compared them to the best of my ability and can't see any differences... is this something that only an electron microscope will see



where does this information come from. Is it myth or fact?... and if it is fact, can someone please provide me with the facts



thanks


I suspect that there is no difference at all. Thicker chrome would require that more iron be removed in the grinding operation. Also the heat transfer rate would go down as the chrome gets thicker. Just my opinion.



I could be wrong.



Lynn E. Hanover



This is a Ford powered Riley chassis at Michael Shank Racing.
Old 05-25-2008 | 07:58 AM
  #5  
thebluerx7's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
From: australia
Default

interesting,would love to know if they are different for sure.
Old 05-25-2008 | 08:58 AM
  #6  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by thebluerx7' post='900979
nope. that part, the expensive hard part, is the same.




Between housings of a given series, the only difference between n/a and turbo is the diffuser in the exhaust ports on n/a housings.
Old 05-25-2008 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
heretic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 524
Default

And machining for water ports or not...



And knock sensors...



Minor stuff!
Old 05-25-2008 | 11:22 PM
  #8  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by heretic' post='900989' date='May 25 2008, 03:32 PM
And machining for water ports or not...



And knock sensors...



Minor stuff!




Have you verified that the S4 turbo housings had the casting for the knock sensor above the spark plugs? I may be wrong, but I thought the S4 knock sensor was in the center iron near the oil filler tube. Ive always heard that the S4's had the casting, but all of the cars I can remember had the sensor in the iron.
Old 05-26-2008 | 05:43 PM
  #9  
thebluerx7's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
From: australia
Default

what about port timing? is the n/a port timing and port same as the turbo ones?
Old 05-27-2008 | 07:29 AM
  #10  
TheRX7Project's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 96
Default

Knock sensors? What are those


Quick Reply: Turbo rotor housings Vs Non Turbo Rotor housings



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.