Turbo rotor housings Vs Non Turbo Rotor housings
#1
So I keep hearing people say that the chrome thickness on a turbo housing is thicker then that of a non turbo housing... but I have compared them to the best of my ability and can't see any differences... is this something that only an electron microscope will see
where does this information come from. Is it myth or fact?... and if it is fact, can someone please provide me with the facts
thanks
where does this information come from. Is it myth or fact?... and if it is fact, can someone please provide me with the facts
thanks
#4
Originally Posted by Bastard' post='900887' date='May 23 2008, 08:33 AM
So I keep hearing people say that the chrome thickness on a turbo housing is thicker then that of a non turbo housing... but I have compared them to the best of my ability and can't see any differences... is this something that only an electron microscope will see
where does this information come from. Is it myth or fact?... and if it is fact, can someone please provide me with the facts
thanks
where does this information come from. Is it myth or fact?... and if it is fact, can someone please provide me with the facts
thanks
I suspect that there is no difference at all. Thicker chrome would require that more iron be removed in the grinding operation. Also the heat transfer rate would go down as the chrome gets thicker. Just my opinion.
I could be wrong.
Lynn E. Hanover
This is a Ford powered Riley chassis at Michael Shank Racing.
#6
#8
Originally Posted by heretic' post='900989' date='May 25 2008, 03:32 PM
And machining for water ports or not...
And knock sensors...
Minor stuff!
And knock sensors...
Minor stuff!
Have you verified that the S4 turbo housings had the casting for the knock sensor above the spark plugs? I may be wrong, but I thought the S4 knock sensor was in the center iron near the oil filler tube. Ive always heard that the S4's had the casting, but all of the cars I can remember had the sensor in the iron.