Sm2
#1
Dear John--
Thank you for your recent letter to the SEB about national class status for
SM2. Because there has been some confusion about what is and is not
happening with SM2, I wanted to take this chance to give you an update on
where things currently stand.
The SEB is committed to the growth of Solo 2. SM and SM2 have been
phenomenonally successful parts of that growth in the last few years.
Certainly, both classes are clearly integral to the future of Solo. Because
they are so important, ensuring rule stability, clarity, and completeness is
crucial to address. As the number of technical bulletins, clarifications,
and rules proposals generated for SM this year testifies, this goal of
clear, stable, and complete rules for SM has not yet been met.
Both the Street Modified Advisory Committee and the Solo Events Board have
been working hard to identify and resolve areas of ambiguity and
incompleteness in the SM/SM2 rules. It is our hope to present the Board of
Directors a clarified set of rules that will become effective for SM2 upon
publication. The establishment of such rules will better protect
competitors' investments of time, effort, and money in preparing their cars
for competition by ensuring that a car prepared to the rules today will be
legal for competition throughout the year.
Because SM2 is currently a supplemental class, we have the flexibility to
address problems in the rules in a rapid manner. This means that any
identified areas of ambiguity or incompleteness can be remedied. As you
likely know, once a class receives national status such a process is not
possible. Proposed changes to rules for established national classes must
be published in Fastrack, undergo member comment, and be presented to the
Board of Directors for implementation the *following* year. This means that
the work on the SM rule set must progress along two parallel tracks. Areas
of incompleteness and ambiguity can be resolved before we present a proposal
for SM2 national status for the 2004 year to the BoD whereas such rule
changes for SM cannot be enacted until 2005, as the 2004 rules season ended
in August of this year.
Having said all this, let me be very clear that it is our hope and
expectation to forward a complete and clear rule set to the Board of
Directors later this month. The Board of Directors will ultimately make the
decision about whether or not to grant SM2 national class status for 2004.
Unfortunately, this proposal will reach them well after our August 2003
deadline for 2004 changes. Despite this, I am hopeful that they will give
the proposal to grant SM2 national status in 2004 their very careful
consideration. Regardless of their decision, I would like to say very
clearly that any rumor you may have heard about SM2 being discontinued is
untrue. SM2 will continue to be offered, either as a national class or as a
supplemental class, in 2004 and beyond.
Again, thank you very much for your input to the Solo Events Board. I hope
that I've answered your questions, but if I have missed something, please
let me know.
Mari Clements
SoPac Solo Events Board and
one of the liaisons to the
Street Modified Advisory Committee
Thank you for your recent letter to the SEB about national class status for
SM2. Because there has been some confusion about what is and is not
happening with SM2, I wanted to take this chance to give you an update on
where things currently stand.
The SEB is committed to the growth of Solo 2. SM and SM2 have been
phenomenonally successful parts of that growth in the last few years.
Certainly, both classes are clearly integral to the future of Solo. Because
they are so important, ensuring rule stability, clarity, and completeness is
crucial to address. As the number of technical bulletins, clarifications,
and rules proposals generated for SM this year testifies, this goal of
clear, stable, and complete rules for SM has not yet been met.
Both the Street Modified Advisory Committee and the Solo Events Board have
been working hard to identify and resolve areas of ambiguity and
incompleteness in the SM/SM2 rules. It is our hope to present the Board of
Directors a clarified set of rules that will become effective for SM2 upon
publication. The establishment of such rules will better protect
competitors' investments of time, effort, and money in preparing their cars
for competition by ensuring that a car prepared to the rules today will be
legal for competition throughout the year.
Because SM2 is currently a supplemental class, we have the flexibility to
address problems in the rules in a rapid manner. This means that any
identified areas of ambiguity or incompleteness can be remedied. As you
likely know, once a class receives national status such a process is not
possible. Proposed changes to rules for established national classes must
be published in Fastrack, undergo member comment, and be presented to the
Board of Directors for implementation the *following* year. This means that
the work on the SM rule set must progress along two parallel tracks. Areas
of incompleteness and ambiguity can be resolved before we present a proposal
for SM2 national status for the 2004 year to the BoD whereas such rule
changes for SM cannot be enacted until 2005, as the 2004 rules season ended
in August of this year.
Having said all this, let me be very clear that it is our hope and
expectation to forward a complete and clear rule set to the Board of
Directors later this month. The Board of Directors will ultimately make the
decision about whether or not to grant SM2 national class status for 2004.
Unfortunately, this proposal will reach them well after our August 2003
deadline for 2004 changes. Despite this, I am hopeful that they will give
the proposal to grant SM2 national status in 2004 their very careful
consideration. Regardless of their decision, I would like to say very
clearly that any rumor you may have heard about SM2 being discontinued is
untrue. SM2 will continue to be offered, either as a national class or as a
supplemental class, in 2004 and beyond.
Again, thank you very much for your input to the Solo Events Board. I hope
that I've answered your questions, but if I have missed something, please
let me know.
Mari Clements
SoPac Solo Events Board and
one of the liaisons to the
Street Modified Advisory Committee
#2
What car do you plan on running in SM2?? I thought about running my TII in it if they decide to Ax BP. I would have to read all the rules again though I have read BP many times. Never really looked at SM2.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
banis181
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
0
07-20-2006 08:07 PM
wanklin
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
4
06-03-2005 10:17 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)