Local transit looking for bailout
#1
are your local transportation services looking for bailouts?
Ours is, even if you dont ride the trains or buses you will pay, if you make over $300k a year, you will REALLY pay.
I think they said people making over $100k a year will pay about $650 a year.
So if they place a .50 cent a gallon gas tax increase can we make people who ride the buses and trains pay some of that too?
Ours is, even if you dont ride the trains or buses you will pay, if you make over $300k a year, you will REALLY pay.
I think they said people making over $100k a year will pay about $650 a year.
So if they place a .50 cent a gallon gas tax increase can we make people who ride the buses and trains pay some of that too?
#7
I actually have mixed feelings on this issue. In general, I hate making non-users pay for a service, but public transportation makes a lot of sense. How many more travel lanes do we need to build to alleviate rush-hour congestion? It seems like people would rather sit idling in traffic for two hours rather than take the train. I recognize that for some, it just doesn't work, but for a lot of other people, it would.
Our roads are crumbling, rush hour congestion is out of control. Jack up the gas tax and pay for public transit? Doesn't seem all that crazy to me.
Our roads are crumbling, rush hour congestion is out of control. Jack up the gas tax and pay for public transit? Doesn't seem all that crazy to me.
#9
Originally Posted by defprun' post='919253' date='Mar 27 2009, 10:27 AM
It's expensive on a horse? I thought they got paid in carrots?
and some one has to pay to get all the **** out of the milddle of the road