DISGUSTING!
#121
Originally Posted by SoniX' date='Oct 8 2002, 06:05 PM
wow, phinsup just owned someone I think, the debate between bigtime and christi is one that is based on a basic mis understanding I think, Christi is talking about relationships, of the variety that last a long time, or at least an appreciable amount of time, Bigtime is talking about random sex, a psuedo relationship that lasts at most, a week or so, which is fine, as long as everyone involved in the wild monkey sex understands that that is all it is, and possibly, that is all it will ever be, I say a week at most because after about this time one of two things is going to happen, you are going to have enough time to get to know them and either A. you are going to realize that this person, no matter how hot they are, is either stupid, or just plain annoying, and you are going to decide that the sex is not worth putting up with, or B. you are going to realize that this person you have been ******* has a personality that you enjoy, on top of being fun in the sack, and you are going to have a desire to talk to them, at which point you move away from the "**** buddy" designation, and move towards the relationship zone, Bigtime: the reason you havn't had a "relationship yet, is because you just havn't talked to any of them enough to get to know them, you should try it some time, you might enjoy it.
#126
I'll say it once and I'll say it again.
They are ***** if they're easy to ****.
You're a philanderer, well, just cause. Unless you're all talk....
And getting drunk, or getting a girl drunk and ******* them is a real smart idea.... Really.
They are ***** if they're easy to ****.
You're a philanderer, well, just cause. Unless you're all talk....
And getting drunk, or getting a girl drunk and ******* them is a real smart idea.... Really.
#127
I'm a little late to the table on this, but as a person arguably more mature than bigtime, I have to say that I agree with him on the relationship front. I've been in a few myself, and at this stage in my life, they are bunk. I'd rather date a few chicks, get some play every so often, and be able to keep my own time for myself.
Also, girls are not necessarily ***** if they are easy to ****. Perhaps they just like sex. Either that, you should also consider guys to be ***** if that's how you define it. If that's the case, then why is being a **** a bad thing?
As far as the drunken party sex, its a great way to land yourself with a kid or a rape charge. I'd shy away from that, but to each their own.
Also, girls are not necessarily ***** if they are easy to ****. Perhaps they just like sex. Either that, you should also consider guys to be ***** if that's how you define it. If that's the case, then why is being a **** a bad thing?
As far as the drunken party sex, its a great way to land yourself with a kid or a rape charge. I'd shy away from that, but to each their own.
#128
I believe I did call him a philanderer, you should know what that means - male *****/male ****.
I don't agree with just finding a girl you can get your hands on to ****, then leave her dirt dry. Then calling her a dirty hoe for doing what you wanted to do to get pleasure among yourself (and her, but still).
Nevermind. Again, noone seems to really understand...
I don't agree with just finding a girl you can get your hands on to ****, then leave her dirt dry. Then calling her a dirty hoe for doing what you wanted to do to get pleasure among yourself (and her, but still).
Nevermind. Again, noone seems to really understand...
#129
There's no good that can come of calling a girl a dirty ho for sleeping with you. I agree with you there, but there is nothing wrong with people who like to have sex. No need to call them ***** or philanderers. Or if you do, they shouldn't be bad.