Carb Or Efi
#1
What's better. Let's hear it.
Carb of EFI, and don't rule out EMS with EFI. Don't limit yourself to comparison of stock ECU versus Carb. Think on a basic accuracy standpoint.
What's better?
I SAY EFI.
Carb of EFI, and don't rule out EMS with EFI. Don't limit yourself to comparison of stock ECU versus Carb. Think on a basic accuracy standpoint.
What's better?
I SAY EFI.
#5
They are absolute no doubt, the absolute WIN when it comes to N/A performance in piston or otherwise powered vehicles and it is a perfectly viable solution, not too mention a cheap way to produce powear with a snail.
#6
EFI is just more accurate plain and simple.
Carbs are easier to tune and whatever, but they're big and dirty. Right? That's what me and defprun argue about like every other day.
I SAY EFI IS BETTER. IT'S A MORE ACCURATE WAY.
Carbs are easier to tune and whatever, but they're big and dirty. Right? That's what me and defprun argue about like every other day.
I SAY EFI IS BETTER. IT'S A MORE ACCURATE WAY.
#7
Yeah but I'm not talking about how much it costs.
I'm saying take the same car, same engine, same everything, and tune it to perfection with a carb, and tune it to perfection with an EMS using EFI.
What one will get better more accurate results?
I'm saying take the same car, same engine, same everything, and tune it to perfection with a carb, and tune it to perfection with an EMS using EFI.
What one will get better more accurate results?
#9
Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Jan 4 2004, 08:57 PM
Yeah but I'm not talking about how much it costs.
I'm saying take the same car, same engine, same everything, and tune it to perfection with a carb, and tune it to perfection with an EMS using EFI.
What one will get better more accurate results?
I'm saying take the same car, same engine, same everything, and tune it to perfection with a carb, and tune it to perfection with an EMS using EFI.
What one will get better more accurate results?
You see carbs = win
EFI = teh not win
see!
proof.