BAM!
11-10-2005 | 06:02 PM
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Originally Posted by TYSON' post='777331' date='Nov 10 2005, 02:24 PM
lol
Have you read the thread about the SOLO workshop lately?
I try to stay out of the politics. I have to deal with it at work and I have no desire to put my 2 cents in. Not that I don't care, but I just don't need to aggrevate over something you can't really do much about.
Maybe if I was running 3rd in class and was only .1 seconds off and I would voice my opinion. BUt I'm not 0.1 seconds off. I"m a good 2 seconds to 3 seconds off from the white STI or mustangs in my class. No matter how much arguing I can do there is no way I can get 2 seconds or 3 seconds from words. I just try to focus on other things and treat solo1 as jsut a fun thing to do. Not the be all, do all, of everything in my life. It's amatuer racing. I have no money to win, only money to lose on broken parts.
11-10-2005 | 06:12 PM
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,871
From: London, Ontario
That's the thing, if people don't voice their opinion, or at least give a viewpoint that others may not have thought of, nothing gets accomplished.
The rule change I am opposing is intended to target a very few people they assume are cheating. After pointing out that it affects more than those who cheat I hope they will look at it more carefully.
BTW, your contribution was a pointless personal attack. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
The rule change I am opposing is intended to target a very few people they assume are cheating. After pointing out that it affects more than those who cheat I hope they will look at it more carefully.
BTW, your contribution was a pointless personal attack. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
11-10-2005 | 08:02 PM
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Originally Posted by TYSON' post='777403' date='Nov 10 2005, 06:12 PM
That's the thing, if people don't voice their opinion, or at least give a viewpoint that others may not have thought of, nothing gets accomplished.
The rule change I am opposing is intended to target a very few people they assume are cheating. After pointing out that it affects more than those who cheat I hope they will look at it more carefully.
BTW, your contribution was a pointless personal attack. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
spineless jelly fish? it wasn't meant to be taken seriously
11-13-2005 | 07:41 PM
#19
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16
Not that I should care but can someone explain to me the history of BAM.
Here is what I know:
1. Used often on Canadian Section of RX7Club in years gone past.
2. MyRxBad complaind about BAMMING being immature.( in confidence)
3. Mods come down hard on BAMMERS.
4. MyRxBad starts poll about Moderators in Canadian Section.
5. Silverrotor outs MyRxBad as the stoolie in the BAMMING affair.
6. BAMMING continues on Nopistons.
I am missing the part about why BAMMING was or is funny. I hope it is not a you should've been there type scenario. Please fill me in so I can rest in peace.
Here is what I know:
1. Used often on Canadian Section of RX7Club in years gone past.
2. MyRxBad complaind about BAMMING being immature.( in confidence)
3. Mods come down hard on BAMMERS.
4. MyRxBad starts poll about Moderators in Canadian Section.
5. Silverrotor outs MyRxBad as the stoolie in the BAMMING affair.
6. BAMMING continues on Nopistons.
I am missing the part about why BAMMING was or is funny. I hope it is not a you should've been there type scenario. Please fill me in so I can rest in peace.