3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

99 Jdm Turbo's Efficacy Graph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2003 | 12:59 PM
  #1  
MazdaMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,073
From: Merrick NY / St.John's Uni Jamacia, NY
Default

hey im not sure how much boost i can get out of these turbos without compromising durability or efficacy. they are the 99's i know they made more than one set these are the ones that produced 285hp anyway anyone know where do get this graph. ive seen one for the older 93's but i cant find that one either. please heeelllppppp.



mike
Old 03-29-2003 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

15 psi max..... for efficiency reasons
Old 03-29-2003 | 02:37 PM
  #3  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

post the one that you have for 93 spec turbos
Old 03-30-2003 | 12:50 PM
  #4  
rxtacy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 208
From: Orlando, FL
Default

15 psi max..... for efficiency reasons
you really think 15psi would be safe? that would scare me. would it be better to run non-seq at 15psi?
Old 03-30-2003 | 12:59 PM
  #5  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

it should be better to run non sequential at high boost........ cuz on sequential, the first turbo spools up to max boost then spools the second one ..... on a non seq, the spool at the same time



at least thats my understanding of things........ someone please correct me if im wrong
Old 03-30-2003 | 04:00 PM
  #6  
MazdaMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,073
From: Merrick NY / St.John's Uni Jamacia, NY
Default

yea it makes sense to go non sequential. but no one has these graphs.



i dont have the one for the 93's although i have seen it b4 on some web site or another.
Old 03-31-2003 | 12:10 AM
  #7  
twinturborx7pete's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 993
From: Panama City Beach, Florida
Default

eh i like non seq... more predictable boost... and if you see my engine bay, you'd understand 3 vacuum lines.
Old 03-31-2003 | 12:23 AM
  #8  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

Originally Posted by twinturborx7pete' date='Mar 30 2003, 09:10 PM
eh i like non seq... more predictable boost... and if you see my engine bay, you'd understand 3 vacuum lines.
probably easier to controll boost too right?
Old 03-31-2003 | 12:30 AM
  #9  
twinturborx7pete's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 993
From: Panama City Beach, Florida
Default

yep...
Old 03-31-2003 | 10:59 AM
  #10  
rxtacy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 208
From: Orlando, FL
Default

eh i like non seq... more predictable boost... and if you see my engine bay, you'd understand 3 vacuum lines.
so do you ever run at 15psi? if so what kind of power do you get out of the extra 5psi? i'm just curious cuz i'm gonna switch my j-spec turbos to non-seq soon.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.