2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

camden supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2005 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
turtles87rx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Default

i am interested in supercharging my 87 base model rx-7. The motor has around 175k on it. i was originally planning on turbocharging me car, but after reading, i thought it would be too much trouble(correct me if i am wrong). When researching superchargers, i read that it puts a good amount of stress on the engine. Should i rebuild my engine before i supercharge it? I live in eastern washington, so it is about a 3-4 hour drive to atkins/camden. What i was thinking was if I need to rebuild the motor, get enough money and take it up to get rebuilt and ported possibly, then pick up a supercharger when im there. how much money would it take for a rebiuld, port, and supercharger( i think ~ 2500)? Thank you!
Old 11-20-2005 | 10:32 PM
  #2  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

I would get a rebuld with that much mileage anyway.
Old 11-20-2005 | 10:50 PM
  #3  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

rebuild and port...as in someone else rebuilding your motor?



those two alone are gonna be pretty pricey.



then you add in trhe supercharger...



better have plenty of funding before even ttempting to have all this done.



kevin.
Old 11-21-2005 | 09:11 AM
  #4  
RONIN FC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
Default

Now that your rebuilding, use turbo rotors.
Old 11-21-2005 | 09:14 AM
  #5  
One320B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 959
Default

Atkins will rebuild a motor for about $2k w/ no porting, its $300 for mild streetporting...so you can probably have your motor done for $2300 if you bring them the motor, if you were to drive your car to the shop and have them take it out...rebuilt/port...put back in..you'll probably be closer to $3K...



I'm not sure about the SC costs....that depends on which pulley you go with, and how much additional work you plan to do to support the SC, such as a clutch, maybe T2 driveline, fuel/ignition mods, etc...
Old 11-21-2005 | 04:59 PM
  #6  
donhayes's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 485
From: El Paso, TX
Default

its cheaper to turbocharge your car than it is to supercharge it. You'll get cheaper and easier hp with a turbo too.
Old 11-21-2005 | 05:07 PM
  #7  
One320B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 959
Default

It's about the same...I like turbo power for my own reasons, but I'm not going to argue seeing some SC FCs around
Old 11-21-2005 | 06:25 PM
  #8  
turtles87rx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Default

yeah I will go with the rebiuld and port definately, now i am considerering turboing the motor if it is indeed cheaper. thank you all for now i must go look at n/a to turbo conversion topics for many hours
Old 11-21-2005 | 11:25 PM
  #9  
rotaryinspired's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 233
From: Oklahoma City
Default

either way forced induction isn't cheap. To do either correctly I would say its about the same. It just depends on your use of the car. For street use the SC would be awesome. 8,10,12 psi through out the entire power band, No Lag. If it is for drag strip turbo all the way. Road course set up I would go turbo, but that is just me. SC could be good there as well. Its a choice of setups for what you are looking for. NOt which one is cheap. Neither are.
Old 11-22-2005 | 06:15 PM
  #10  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

Actuall if you stay away from efi, the kit is really reasonable. If you want to use your efi it jumps by alot on the price.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.