2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Bac Removal, Stock Ecu, 88 T2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2004 | 10:28 PM
  #1  
1988RedT2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,532
From: VA
Default

As it seems the BAC valve is responsible for maintaining idle speed, what can I expect from removing the thing, and blocking off the spot it once occupied on the UIM?
Old 03-13-2004 | 10:49 PM
  #2  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

your car may stall out when you turn the steering wheel when it is parked.
Old 03-13-2004 | 10:57 PM
  #3  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

or turn on the defroster
Old 03-13-2004 | 10:58 PM
  #4  
1988RedT2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,532
From: VA
Default

So basically, I should leave it there until I install a standalone?
Old 03-13-2004 | 11:09 PM
  #5  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' date='Mar 14 2004, 03:58 AM
So basically, I should leave it there until I install a standalone?
standalone doesnt change the need for an IAC of some sort, unless you don't mind setting a relatively high idle and letting it fluctuate under the varying loads. (this is basically how my car is configured currently, but I am thinking about adding an IAC so I can setup fastidle @ cold start and at that point I might as well just use it for regular idle control too)



standalones support controlling an IAC, the haltechs support the BACV natively.
Old 03-13-2004 | 11:11 PM
  #6  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

there is also no Horsepower performance gains of removing your emissions solenoids and lines.
Old 03-13-2004 | 11:59 PM
  #7  
roadkill669's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 572
From: Culpeper, VA
Default

It helped my car run better. I removed everything at one time. It really made the car feel better. Not a HP gain, but it was smoother. My car idles where it wants to now. But if I really wanted to, I could get it below 1500, but why would i do that.



The car wont stall out if you dont have power steering
Old 03-14-2004 | 12:49 AM
  #8  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

i doin't understand why people go out of their ways to remove things that make the car less user friendly. THey are there for a reason.
Old 03-14-2004 | 04:05 PM
  #9  
1988RedT2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,532
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Mar 14 2004, 12:49 AM
i doin't understand why people go out of their ways to remove things that make the car less user friendly. THey are there for a reason.
I'm definitely not one of those people. The reason I'm asking this question is that I have removed the stock TID and turbo bypass valve and replaced them with a custom made TID and a Turbo XS type H34 respectively. Since the BACV draws air from the same fitting where the H34 is, I didn't want to add nipples where I didn't absolutely have to.
Old 03-14-2004 | 04:07 PM
  #10  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

so u would rather remove the BAC, reroute the cooling lines? live with high idle instead of drilling a hole in your custom made inlet duct and epoxying a nipple on?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.