2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

13B N/A options...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2002 | 10:45 PM
  #11  
horn4858's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 441
From: forest city,n.c.
Default

shitfire all it needs is to be driven
Old 07-13-2002 | 11:37 PM
  #12  
89 Rag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,467
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Shane.Trammell' date='Jul 12 2002, 01:53 PM
ok sell the na engine find a used turbo one and rebuild it. then you will need the trans and the drive shaft and wiring and rear end and pretty much everything that the car needs to move.
Hey, snapperhead go spank the ***** and watch saved by the bell, you're wasting my time. the turbo project is next.
Old 07-14-2002 | 01:43 AM
  #13  
89 Rag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,467
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jul 13 2002, 01:33 AM
[quote name='Rotaryman88' date='Jul 12 2002, 09:25 AM']Supercharger kits do not exist any longer for our cars, if you try to contact Camden or Paxton, you'll find out that they do not make supercharger kits any longer(bastards!)...
Camden superchargers is owned by Atkins, and as far as I know they are still in busness. Isamu was down there (Atkins) not too long ago, and said he saw some of their SCs. [/quote]

I checked out the site @ atkins and i think after my engine is broke in ill set up to run the SC. Thanks to all for the info



James
Old 07-14-2002 | 09:11 AM
  #14  
SoniX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 558
From: Sarasota, Florida
Default

aahrrggh, SC's damn rpm limiting small mid range power making complicated power leaching pieces of crap! That being said your engine sounds like it is more than capable of handling some sort of forced induction. the difficulty with SC's is that they are not really good for high revving engines, as in order to keep your normal redline, you have to gear it so that it doesn't make enough power until way up high, that is why they are used a lot on v8's since they don't rev high, the gearing can be set to make more power sooner, wheras with a turbo, not only do you not have the parasitic drain of running something else off the e-shaft (hurting you in the low end) but, you are not limiting your redline, which is good, because these engines make a lot of power higher up. turbos make use of otherwise wasted power (waste exhuast) and are easier to hook up (in theory, if you can do the plumbing)
Old 07-15-2002 | 06:58 PM
  #15  
89 Rag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,467
From: Portland, OR
Default

Well ****, Ill put the damn turbo on it, just open my billfold and spend the god damn money for me. j/k Can someone direct me to a website where I might find and entire kit? I mean everything ill need to adapt N/A engine/89 chassis to turbo. No mickey mouse bullshit, If im gonna buy it i want all of it and i want quality parts too. Thanks



James
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris Taylor
Performance Mods
2
04-05-2008 03:53 PM
Jonlax
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
15
06-13-2006 03:24 AM
Mr. Ashe
1st Generation Specific
16
10-17-2002 03:33 PM
Rotaryman88
Insert BS here
2
09-16-2001 09:46 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.